The code of ethics for physicists and philosophers Ethics are components of a system by which one may distinguish between two or more equally desirable and undesirable options. At least, that’s how ethics are differentiated from morals, the latter being the system by which one distinguishes between good and bad. Unlike morals, ethics do not … Continue reading A dangerous series of if-then statements
Is there any difference, truly, between physics and philosophy? Of course not, you knave. There’s an entire course about it. I am enrolled in this course. And what is the point of an interdisciplinary investigation that yields only support for further differentiation of said disciplines? I am a rebel, though. To spite the inevitability of … Continue reading An introduction to the philosophers in all physicists
An exploration of the disneyfication of the infamous Shakespearean prince. The productive actions of the Walt Disney Company are motivated, above all else, by money. More specifically, the global influence is motivated by family money. The mouse looks magical and fuzzy as it latches itself parasitically to parent’s wallets, and because the rodent is superficially … Continue reading Hamlet caught in Mickey’s mouse trap
We don’t hate people. We hate our responses to people. This is one of the rather seemingly unrelated conclusions bred as a result of the various counterparts of communication. Allow me to explain. All social interactions can be broken down into a series of communicative exchanges. Recall in “Side Affects of a Logolepsy Infliction” that … Continue reading Humans hate themselves, not others.
It is no coincidence that the French word signifying a “breakup” is rupture. Rupture. As a volcano. As a sickly appendix. In the case of the latter metaphor, the appendix swells with pus and inflames, an emetic and painful process that demands swift and unyielding medical attention. At the time of its rupture, the appendix acquires … Continue reading Romantic Appendicitis, and how to avoid it
Hereby the Maverick 